December 11, 2016
TO: Honorable Judge Brown, Grifith, and Pillar,
Circuit Judges 333 Constitution AVE NW
5205 WASHINGTON DC. 20500
(202) 354-3000
FROM: Joann Mae Spotted Bear Social Security Number # ___-___-___ - also U-025530 Oglala Lakota Sioux Tribal Number, Blood degree 29/32 = 96 % full blooded Lakota, and United Nation ECOSOC number 351311, 3rd Party Intervenor For the People of The Tetuwan Lakota Sioux Oyate : Lakota Tetuwan of the 1851, 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty Agreement:
RE: Friend of the Court Brief, United States of Army Corps of Engineers and the Dakota Access LLC. 1:16--cv-01534-JEB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA APPEALS FILED 10/9/2016 DOCUMENT NUMBER #1640062 (CORRECT)
On behalf of the Tetuwan Lakota Siux Oyate Original Peoples we hereby call upon the the United State Court of appeals to file an injunction against the consstruction of the the Dakota Acces Piplene for violating, The Historical Preservation Act section 106, Tradtitonal Landscape Action, Section 106 of the National Historical Preservation ActProperties, 36 C.F.R part 800. and 800.2 of the In 1851, 1868 Fort Laramie will Intervene on behalf of the Tetuwan Lakota Oyate : One of the most important treaties was signed at Fort Laramie in present-day, This Treaty also made it to the International World Treaty list in the chronological list of International treaties and agreements. of 450 BCE-"Ramses-Hattusili Treaty
WHEREAS:
1803 Judicial Review established by Marbury v . Madison 1803 The Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Marshall decided the landmark case of William Marbury versus James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States and confirms the legal principle. From the 16th American Judisprudenc3, Second Edition, Section 177
WHEREAS:
1789
Constitution for the United States of America Adopted September 17, 1787, In effect March 4th, 1789 Artical V, the Process for ratification by the People.
1789
George Washington's inauguration on April 30th 1789 “The states as political entities and not the people, entered into a firm league of friendship "each State retaining "its sovereignty, freedom and independence." Supremacy clause article 6 clause 2 of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, Article VI, section 2 of the U. S. Constitution which reads: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."
Thus a Supreme Court ruling can be binding on state courts if involving a constitutional issue.
WHEREAS:
Indian tribes never gave up land in exchange for promises by the U.S government but rather in trust a government will uphold good faith to obey LAW, *Until 1871 treaties were the way in which the United States conducted its relations, With Indian Tribes, most treaties contained two things: 1) tribes allow land use aged to the U.S. and 2) the U.S. provides federally protected reservations.
WHEREAS:
Compliance With Related Laws Activities that require Corps permits may also require permits or approvals from other Federal, Tribal, state, or local agencies.
The Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate, if an activity that requires Federal authorization (such as a Corps permit) may affect endangered or threatened species or critical habitat. As a result of the consultation process, the Corps may add special conditions to the permit to ensure that the activity does not jeopardize endangered or threatened species or destroy or adversely modify critical habitat, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permitting Process Information
WHEREAS:
Article 18 and the Section 106 Process
The Declaration, while not having the force of law, expresses ideas. Article 18 of the Declaration addresses the right of indigenous peoples to participate in decision-making when their rights would be affected. The scope of this article is very broad, covering all rights to which indigenous peoples are entitled.
Regardless, Section 106 seems consistent with the thrust of Article 18 of the Declaration in various respects. For instance, Section 101(d)(6)(B) of the NHPA and the Section 106 regulations require federal agencies to invite Indian tribes and NHOs to participate in Section 106 consultation when an undertaking may affect historic properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to them. These consultation requirements are intended to ensure that Indian tribes and NHOs have the opportunity not only to identify those places of religious and cultural importance to them (sometimes referred to as sacred sites) but also to influence federal decision making in order to protect those places.
Benefits of e106 for Federal agencies: Prompts federal agencies to provide complete information to the ACHP (as required in the regulations at § 800.11(e)), potentially eliminating delays caused by requests for additional information;
The legal standing is based on: Inherited Trust of Onerous Fiduciary duty of human rights based on Treaty agreement legal standing, A tribal agency has no say on treaty based on the 80-4 of the Sioux Nation Treaty Council of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation of Pine ridge, states as follows.
Under Oath of Federal Agency of Courts concerning the United States:
5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law. 1871 Constitution of United States of America NOT ratified by the people required under:
Article V, Constitution 1789.
WHEREAS:
In accordance with the given facts of the [United States of America and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA bda corporation [28 USC 3002]
The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 9, 1933 Due to the fact the United States of America, surrender sovereignty and went bankrupt. Abandoned ship WILLFULLY and LAWFULLY by giving the United Nation priority over their documents of Treaty or Doctrine of Discovery, Without notifying the beneficiary of the land.
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been Dissolved by the “Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress, M Session June 5, 1933—because of the Bankruptcy of the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33 where all of Congress was forced to adjourn
“Without Day” in 1861 March 3, “sin die.”
-----------------( MEANING NEVER TO MEET AGAIN.)!!-------
WHEREAS:
WE DEMAND PROOF THAT THE UNITED STATES SHOW TO US A LAND TITLE OR DEED aof the following dba corperation of Standing rock Agency, Chyanne Eagle Butte, Dakota Access Pipeline LLC, can prove to us that the dba Corperation can Lawfully give the Dakota access a Charter permite to abuse Treaty and native Americain Indigouse people and our Inherite rights to abuse Treaty agreement of the world , the Fort Laramie treaty of 1851 is not only a National Treaty but also a International Treaty agreement on Land grab,
Sovereign immunity:
This section does not constitute a waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States, nor does it authorize tribal justice systems to review actions of the Secretary. (Pub. L. 103–177, title I, § 102, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2015.)
Public funds: obstructed justice: fraud by trickery: RICO 1951 - 1961
NOTICE: Any levy or lien asserted by any agency, operating as an arm of a foreign entity; which engages in Fraud by Trickery; 18 U.S.C. 4 and which does not recognize the Fort Laramie Treaties of 1851 and 1868 and/or all worldwide Treaties; or, has not secured the proper Writ is herein REJECTED as being VOID AB INITIO. Due to the process and procedure and fact given Dakota Access Pipeline has no Treaty and No Legal Federal writ within accordance to the UNITED STATES of AMERICA
Supreme Law.
Respectfully.
Joann Spotted Bear-Mato Gleska Weyan- of the Original Sovereignty Immunity beneficiary, Tetuwan Treaty Representative U3442550 always in support of National and International Laws of the Land, United Nations ESOSOC Diplomatic Immunity number 351311, MAY 23, 2014 $ 300,000 Billion per Treaty neglected * of the Tetuwan Treaty Fort Laramie 1841 Sitting Bull -1851-1868 - Little Big Horn and Wounded Knee 1890 massacre aka Chumpi Opi Surviving Desendant -Personal time, and Investigation time $ 251,000,00 per day
TREATY MEMBER consent is value forward as value accepted:
Bad Man Removed
Disclaimer: I, Joann Spotted Bear, AKA: Mato Gleska weyen; Director: A.R.R. , Tetuwan Lakota Oyate Nation: P.O.W. Camp 344 AKA Reservation; reserve the right to amend or make further corrections to this document: Without prejudice as further information becomes available. Furthermore: I do not agree to any civil penalty nor criminal penalties as my investigations into the facts/evidence was given me without any force, duress and or threats.
TO: Honorable Judge Brown, Grifith, and Pillar,
Circuit Judges 333 Constitution AVE NW
5205 WASHINGTON DC. 20500
(202) 354-3000
FROM: Joann Mae Spotted Bear Social Security Number # ___-___-___ - also U-025530 Oglala Lakota Sioux Tribal Number, Blood degree 29/32 = 96 % full blooded Lakota, and United Nation ECOSOC number 351311, 3rd Party Intervenor For the People of The Tetuwan Lakota Sioux Oyate : Lakota Tetuwan of the 1851, 1868 Fort Laramie Treaty Agreement:
RE: Friend of the Court Brief, United States of Army Corps of Engineers and the Dakota Access LLC. 1:16--cv-01534-JEB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA APPEALS FILED 10/9/2016 DOCUMENT NUMBER #1640062 (CORRECT)
On behalf of the Tetuwan Lakota Siux Oyate Original Peoples we hereby call upon the the United State Court of appeals to file an injunction against the consstruction of the the Dakota Acces Piplene for violating, The Historical Preservation Act section 106, Tradtitonal Landscape Action, Section 106 of the National Historical Preservation ActProperties, 36 C.F.R part 800. and 800.2 of the In 1851, 1868 Fort Laramie will Intervene on behalf of the Tetuwan Lakota Oyate : One of the most important treaties was signed at Fort Laramie in present-day, This Treaty also made it to the International World Treaty list in the chronological list of International treaties and agreements. of 450 BCE-"Ramses-Hattusili Treaty
WHEREAS:
1803 Judicial Review established by Marbury v . Madison 1803 The Supreme Court led by Chief Justice John Marshall decided the landmark case of William Marbury versus James Madison, Secretary of State of the United States and confirms the legal principle. From the 16th American Judisprudenc3, Second Edition, Section 177
- The states did not give the Citizen his/ hers rights and thus cannot take them away as it chooses. The state did not establish the settled maxims and procedures,
- Legislative enactment DO NOT constitute the Law of the Land. A violation of an Indian Treaty is a violation of Federal Law The lead case that said treaty law cannot be interfered with by a state legislature in Ware v. Hylton, [(1976) 3 Dall. (3 U.S. 199)] Legal maximum: No law can create harm BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY Eighth Ed. Also, legal maximum "no one can forfeit another person's rights." and no office out to be injurious to no one, Legal Maximum: “it is a fraud to conceal a fraud.” deliberately causing one to act in his or her detriment
WHEREAS:
1789
Constitution for the United States of America Adopted September 17, 1787, In effect March 4th, 1789 Artical V, the Process for ratification by the People.
1789
George Washington's inauguration on April 30th 1789 “The states as political entities and not the people, entered into a firm league of friendship "each State retaining "its sovereignty, freedom and independence." Supremacy clause article 6 clause 2 of the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, Article VI, section 2 of the U. S. Constitution which reads: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding."
Thus a Supreme Court ruling can be binding on state courts if involving a constitutional issue.
WHEREAS:
Indian tribes never gave up land in exchange for promises by the U.S government but rather in trust a government will uphold good faith to obey LAW, *Until 1871 treaties were the way in which the United States conducted its relations, With Indian Tribes, most treaties contained two things: 1) tribes allow land use aged to the U.S. and 2) the U.S. provides federally protected reservations.
WHEREAS:
Compliance With Related Laws Activities that require Corps permits may also require permits or approvals from other Federal, Tribal, state, or local agencies.
The Endangered Species Act requires Federal agencies to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate, if an activity that requires Federal authorization (such as a Corps permit) may affect endangered or threatened species or critical habitat. As a result of the consultation process, the Corps may add special conditions to the permit to ensure that the activity does not jeopardize endangered or threatened species or destroy or adversely modify critical habitat, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permitting Process Information
WHEREAS:
Article 18 and the Section 106 Process
The Declaration, while not having the force of law, expresses ideas. Article 18 of the Declaration addresses the right of indigenous peoples to participate in decision-making when their rights would be affected. The scope of this article is very broad, covering all rights to which indigenous peoples are entitled.
Regardless, Section 106 seems consistent with the thrust of Article 18 of the Declaration in various respects. For instance, Section 101(d)(6)(B) of the NHPA and the Section 106 regulations require federal agencies to invite Indian tribes and NHOs to participate in Section 106 consultation when an undertaking may affect historic properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to them. These consultation requirements are intended to ensure that Indian tribes and NHOs have the opportunity not only to identify those places of religious and cultural importance to them (sometimes referred to as sacred sites) but also to influence federal decision making in order to protect those places.
Benefits of e106 for Federal agencies: Prompts federal agencies to provide complete information to the ACHP (as required in the regulations at § 800.11(e)), potentially eliminating delays caused by requests for additional information;
- Provides an automated response when information is submitted, confirming receipt of submitted documentation, and starting the 15-day review period (assuming all specified information is provided).
The legal standing is based on: Inherited Trust of Onerous Fiduciary duty of human rights based on Treaty agreement legal standing, A tribal agency has no say on treaty based on the 80-4 of the Sioux Nation Treaty Council of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation of Pine ridge, states as follows.
Under Oath of Federal Agency of Courts concerning the United States:
5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” This section does not affect other oaths required by law. 1871 Constitution of United States of America NOT ratified by the people required under:
Article V, Constitution 1789.
- This second Constitution is a city- state corporation created by the 41 st, congress under the ACT OF 1871. U.S.C § 168- Constitution of United States of America
WHEREAS:
In accordance with the given facts of the [United States of America and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA bda corporation [28 USC 3002]
The Bankruptcy of The United States United States Congressional Record, March 9, 1933 Due to the fact the United States of America, surrender sovereignty and went bankrupt. Abandoned ship WILLFULLY and LAWFULLY by giving the United Nation priority over their documents of Treaty or Doctrine of Discovery, Without notifying the beneficiary of the land.
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been Dissolved by the “Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress, M Session June 5, 1933—because of the Bankruptcy of the United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993, Vol. 33 where all of Congress was forced to adjourn
“Without Day” in 1861 March 3, “sin die.”
-----------------( MEANING NEVER TO MEET AGAIN.)!!-------
WHEREAS:
WE DEMAND PROOF THAT THE UNITED STATES SHOW TO US A LAND TITLE OR DEED aof the following dba corperation of Standing rock Agency, Chyanne Eagle Butte, Dakota Access Pipeline LLC, can prove to us that the dba Corperation can Lawfully give the Dakota access a Charter permite to abuse Treaty and native Americain Indigouse people and our Inherite rights to abuse Treaty agreement of the world , the Fort Laramie treaty of 1851 is not only a National Treaty but also a International Treaty agreement on Land grab,
Sovereign immunity:
This section does not constitute a waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States, nor does it authorize tribal justice systems to review actions of the Secretary. (Pub. L. 103–177, title I, § 102, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2015.)
Public funds: obstructed justice: fraud by trickery: RICO 1951 - 1961
NOTICE: Any levy or lien asserted by any agency, operating as an arm of a foreign entity; which engages in Fraud by Trickery; 18 U.S.C. 4 and which does not recognize the Fort Laramie Treaties of 1851 and 1868 and/or all worldwide Treaties; or, has not secured the proper Writ is herein REJECTED as being VOID AB INITIO. Due to the process and procedure and fact given Dakota Access Pipeline has no Treaty and No Legal Federal writ within accordance to the UNITED STATES of AMERICA
Supreme Law.
Respectfully.
Joann Spotted Bear-Mato Gleska Weyan- of the Original Sovereignty Immunity beneficiary, Tetuwan Treaty Representative U3442550 always in support of National and International Laws of the Land, United Nations ESOSOC Diplomatic Immunity number 351311, MAY 23, 2014 $ 300,000 Billion per Treaty neglected * of the Tetuwan Treaty Fort Laramie 1841 Sitting Bull -1851-1868 - Little Big Horn and Wounded Knee 1890 massacre aka Chumpi Opi Surviving Desendant -Personal time, and Investigation time $ 251,000,00 per day
TREATY MEMBER consent is value forward as value accepted:
Bad Man Removed
Disclaimer: I, Joann Spotted Bear, AKA: Mato Gleska weyen; Director: A.R.R. , Tetuwan Lakota Oyate Nation: P.O.W. Camp 344 AKA Reservation; reserve the right to amend or make further corrections to this document: Without prejudice as further information becomes available. Furthermore: I do not agree to any civil penalty nor criminal penalties as my investigations into the facts/evidence was given me without any force, duress and or threats.
ACT BEFORE 12/30/2016 4PM
Penny Miller - Clerk North Dakota Supreme Court - Taking Public Comment RE: Supreme Court No. 20160436 - In the Matter of a Petition to Permit Temporary Provision of Legal Services by Qualified Attorneys From Outside North Dakota There is an emergency affecting the North Dakota legal system resulting from the high number of arrests related to anti-Dakota Access pipeline matters. There are an insufficient number of qualified and interested criminal defense lawyers in North Dakota currently licensed to represent the over 500 people arrested. Many criminal defense lawyers have already maxed out their public defender allotments. Many others have declined to take on these cases, often due work load capacity, time constraints or conflicts of interest related to the pipeline industry. Furthermore, any requests for change of venue have been denied. Continue reading, copy paste and email. |
|
ACE a/k/a Army Corps of Engineers Letter to Standing Rock Continue reading click here
|
Veterans Stand with Standing Rock
Learn More click here |
Take Action:
We are calling for solidarity actions targeting:
The pipeline companies trying to build the Dakota Access Pipeline
The financial institutions that are lending the money to build the project
Join an existing action near you, or organize an action of your own.
Companies Behind DAPL
The Dakota Access Pipeline is a project being proposed by a collection of pipeline companies, with a complicated and intertwining structure:
Energy Transfer Partners owns a 45% stake in the project
Sunoco Logistics Partners owns a 30% stake
Phillips 66 owns a 25% stake.
Additionally, Enbridge Energy Partners is attempting to buy a 28% stake in the project and Marathon Petroleum Corp is attempting to buy a 9% stake. These companies are hoping to finalzye this deal by the end of September. We are calling on these companies to pull out of the project or to cancel it outright.
Banks Funding DAPL
The companies building DAPL were able to secure a $2.5 billion loan from a collection of banks to build the pipeline. But the pipeline companies can only access $1.1 billion of this loan until certain progress is made on the pipeline project. So we are calling on these lenders to cut off this line of credit to the pipeline companies and to stop funding the DAPL.
Three of the main lenders are Citigroup, TD Securities and Mizuho Bank.
Below is a map of some of the office locations of these targets. In addition to this map there are these resources:
TD Bank Branch Locations in the “United States”
TD Bank Branch Locations in “Canada”
Citibank Branch Locations
CREDIT Source
We are calling for solidarity actions targeting:
The pipeline companies trying to build the Dakota Access Pipeline
The financial institutions that are lending the money to build the project
Join an existing action near you, or organize an action of your own.
Companies Behind DAPL
The Dakota Access Pipeline is a project being proposed by a collection of pipeline companies, with a complicated and intertwining structure:
Energy Transfer Partners owns a 45% stake in the project
Sunoco Logistics Partners owns a 30% stake
Phillips 66 owns a 25% stake.
Additionally, Enbridge Energy Partners is attempting to buy a 28% stake in the project and Marathon Petroleum Corp is attempting to buy a 9% stake. These companies are hoping to finalzye this deal by the end of September. We are calling on these companies to pull out of the project or to cancel it outright.
Banks Funding DAPL
The companies building DAPL were able to secure a $2.5 billion loan from a collection of banks to build the pipeline. But the pipeline companies can only access $1.1 billion of this loan until certain progress is made on the pipeline project. So we are calling on these lenders to cut off this line of credit to the pipeline companies and to stop funding the DAPL.
Three of the main lenders are Citigroup, TD Securities and Mizuho Bank.
Below is a map of some of the office locations of these targets. In addition to this map there are these resources:
TD Bank Branch Locations in the “United States”
TD Bank Branch Locations in “Canada”
Citibank Branch Locations
CREDIT Source
These entities took an "OATH OF OFFICE" to the Constitution
THEY NEED TO UPHOLD IT North Dakota REMOVAL of Sheriff Failing to UPHOLD his "Oath of Office"
Important Information: Bakken Pipeline Resistance Coalition click here
Bakken Pipeline Resistance Coalition .pdf CLICK HERE The Government Quietly Just Approved This Enormous Oil Pipeline |
Jack McCaigOctober 31 at 10:19am ·
Stop Any Pipeline For Free (Anyone can be anywhere and do this for free, it only takes one person to shut down the pipeline. One.) The "US Army Corps of Engineers" is a business: http://www.nwo.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/878649/dakota-access-pipeline-final-ea-and-fonsi-released-for-nd-section-408-crossings/ USACE, Omaha District Regulatory Branch 8901 South 154th Street Omaha, NE 68138-3635 Phone: (402) 896-0896 As well as "Dakota Access, LLC": http://www.energytransfer.com/ops_copp.aspx :Dakota Access, LLC 8111 Westchester Drive Dallas, Texas 75225 Telephone: (214) 981-0700. These are the two businesses involved in said pipeline. Simply call any of the counties tax assessor offices where the depreciation of land is happening and then bill them for it with a notice of lien which clouds up said companies credit, stopping said project until an agreement is met. free. easy. Right Here: https://www.libertyaid.org/shutdownmethod/ U.S. Marshals Service https://www.usmarshals.gov/
Oath of Office: 28 U.S. Code Chapter 37 - UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE U.S. Department of Justice https://www.justice.gov/
|
SAME OWNERS: Dakota Access Pipeline and Sabal Trail Pipeline
|
Robert Redford: I Stand with the Standing Rock Sioux http://time.com/4501580/dakota-access-pipeline-protest/
Morton County Police Strip Search Lakota Woman, Leave in Jail Cell Naked
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2016/10/morton-co-police-strip-search-lakota.html?spref=fb
http://bsnorrell.blogspot.com/2016/10/morton-co-police-strip-search-lakota.html?spref=fb
https://www.facebook.com/joann.s.bear https://www.facebook.com/jwww.facebook.com/joann.s.bearoann.s.bear
BRUCE CLARK Native American Rights Lawyer by OnCivLib Assoc https://youtu.be/lw-MfjqJedA
Standing Rock: Who Let The Dogs Out? http://bestwebsite.website/news/Standing-Rock:-Who-let-the-dogs-out?
Laura Ross
Jodi Rave Spotted Bear
Standing Rock Indian Reservation
Tommy Wildcat
Amy Hernandez Maack
Toby Birney
Brenna Rogers
Jodi Rave Spotted Bear
Standing Rock Indian Reservation
Tommy Wildcat
Amy Hernandez Maack
Toby Birney
Brenna Rogers
List of Oil Spills https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_oil_spills
List of pipeline accidents in the United States in the 21st century https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pipeline_accidents_in_the_United_States_in_the_21st_century